New York law governs these terms, and any court cases that are not sent to arbitration must be heard in New York courts.
This analysis describes what Uniswap's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The provision creates a fixed legal and jurisdictional framework for dispute resolution, ensuring consistent application of a single governing law and establishing venue in a specific geographic location. This standardizes the legal standards and procedural rules applicable to all disputes and determines where litigation proceedings must occur.
This clause means that the legal rules of New York state apply to your relationship with Uniswap, and if you need to go to court, you may have to do so in New York, creating practical barriers for users elsewhere.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any disputes not subject to arbitration shall be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Francisco County, California, and you consent to the personal jurisd...
These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. To the extent that any lawsuit or court proceeding is permitted hereunder, you and StockX agree to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction ...
This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein, without regard to conflict of law principles. Each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Ontario, Canada for t...
Monitoring
Uniswap has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"These Terms will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflict of law rules or principles (whether of New York or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. Any dispute between the parties that is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court will be resolved in the state or federal courts of New York, New York.— Excerpt from Uniswap's Uniswap Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: New York governing law is a common choice for financial services agreements and carries specific implications given NYDFS regulation of virtual currency businesses and New York's developed financial services case law. The choice of New York courts as exclusive venue for non-arbitrated disputes affects users' practical access to legal remedies, particularly those outside the US. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The governing law choice is standard for a company based in or doing significant business in New York. However, for EU and UK users, local courts may decline to apply New York law where it conflicts with mandatory local consumer protection provisions, creating a gap between the terms' stated choice of law and actual enforcement. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU consumers may retain the right to sue in their local courts under EU consumer protection rules regardless of this clause. UK consumers retain similar protections under English private international law. The exclusive New York venue clause is most clearly enforceable for B2B or US-based user disputes. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Institutional users outside the US should assess whether New York governing law creates conflicts with their local regulatory or contractual obligations. Financial institutions in the EU or UK with mandatory local law requirements should seek legal advice on the interaction between New York governing law and their domestic regulatory frameworks. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess the practical impact of New York venue requirements on their dispute resolution processes and ensure that any institutional engagement with Uniswap Labs is structured with appropriate awareness of the governing law provisions.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The provision creates a fixed legal and jurisdictional framework for dispute resolution, ensuring consistent application of a single governing law and establishing venue in a specific geographic location. This standardizes the legal standards and procedural rules applicable to all disputes and determines where litigation proceedings must occur.
This clause means that the legal rules of New York state apply to your relationship with Uniswap, and if you need to go to court, you may have to do so in New York, creating practical barriers for users elsewhere.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 175 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uniswap.