This analysis describes what Telegram's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The prohibition is scoped to public-facing features, and the term 'promote violence' is not defined in this excerpt, leaving its precise scope uncertain.
Interpretive note: The excerpt does not define 'promote violence' or specify precisely what constitutes a 'publicly viewable' feature. The use of 'etc.' suggests the list of features is non-exhaustive.
If the reader promotes violence on publicly viewable Telegram channels, bots, or similar features, they are in breach of Telegram's Terms of Service.
How other platforms handle this
May harm the reputation of Tinder or its affiliates, meaning the uploading or sharing of content on the Tinder platform that is defamatory to Tinder or its affiliates or advocates misuse of the Service...
Political content, including for dissemination in electoral campaigns.
Gore, such as dismemberment, beheadings, mutilations, and exposed organs/bones/muscle
"Promote violence on publicly viewable Telegram channels, bots, etc.Excerpt from Telegram's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The prohibition is scoped to public-facing features, and the term 'promote violence' is not defined in this excerpt, leaving its precise scope uncertain.
If the reader promotes violence on publicly viewable Telegram channels, bots, or similar features, they are in breach of Telegram's Terms of Service.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 244 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Telegram.