Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The policy requires that all claims or actions arising from this Privacy Policy be brought exclusively in Tel Aviv, Israel, under Israeli law, and users expressly agree to this exclusive jurisdiction. No alternative forum is provided.
This analysis describes what Tabnine's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause asserts exclusive Israeli jurisdiction for all privacy-related claims, which may engage tension with GDPR Article 79 (judicial remedy rights before member state courts) and Article 77 (complaint rights before local supervisory authorities) available to EU data subjects, as well as CCPA enforcement mechanisms. Applicable law in EU jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of this forum selection clause against individual data subjects.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of this exclusive forum clause against EU data subjects or California consumers may be limited by applicable statutory rights under GDPR and CCPA that cannot be displaced by contract.
Under this clause, the agreement requires users to submit privacy-related claims to courts in Tel Aviv, Israel, which may present a practical barrier for individual users seeking to enforce rights in their home jurisdictions. EU/EEA users retain the right under GDPR to lodge complaints with their local supervisory authority regardless of contractual jurisdiction provisions.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Exclusive Israeli Jurisdiction for Privacy Claims and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Tabnine has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"This Privacy Policy will be governed and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of Israel without giving effect to its choice of law rules. You expressly agree that the exclusive jurisdiction for any claim or action arising out of or relating to this Privacy Policy shall be submitted to the competent courts in Tel Aviv, Israel, to the exclusion of any other jurisdiction.Excerpt from Tabnine's Privacy Policy
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR Articles 77 and 79, which preserve EU data subjects' rights to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities and bring judicial remedies in their member state courts, irrespective of contractual jurisdiction clauses. Israeli law applies as the stated governing law; Israel has been granted EU adequacy status under GDPR, which provides a basis for data transfers but does not eliminate data subject procedural rights under GDPR. The California Privacy Protection Agency administers CCPA rights for California residents independent of contractual dispute forums. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The exclusive forum clause asserts a significant procedural limitation on individual users that may not be enforceable against EU data subjects exercising GDPR rights. Enterprise customers contracting with Tabnine should evaluate whether this clause affects their own regulatory obligations to ensure data subjects can exercise rights under applicable law. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA users face the highest interpretive tension, as GDPR explicitly preserves local judicial and supervisory authority remedies. UK users face similar considerations under UK GDPR. California residents' CCPA rights are administered by California authorities and are not subject to contractual displacement. Consumer protection laws in many jurisdictions may restrict enforcement of forum selection clauses against individual consumers. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B procurement teams should assess whether this clause affects contractual obligations to ensure data subjects can exercise rights under GDPR or CCPA. Data processing agreements between enterprise customers and Tabnine should address dispute resolution separately from this privacy policy forum clause. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams advising EU-based organizations using Tabnine should confirm that Tabnine's appointment of Prighter Group as EU representative and the availability of supervisory authority complaints provide adequate remedial pathways for data subjects, separate from the contractual forum clause. Organizations should not rely solely on this policy clause as a complete description of available dispute mechanisms for EU or California employees.
This clause asserts exclusive Israeli jurisdiction for all privacy-related claims, which may engage tension with GDPR Article 79 (judicial remedy rights before member state courts) and Article 77 (complaint rights before local supervisory authorities) available to EU data subjects, as well as CCPA enforcement mechanisms. Applicable law in EU jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of this forum selection clause against …
Under this clause, the agreement requires users to submit privacy-related claims to courts in Tel Aviv, Israel, which may present a practical barrier for individual users seeking to enforce rights in their home jurisdictions. EU/EEA users retain the right under GDPR to lodge complaints with their local supervisory authority regardless of contractual jurisdiction provisions.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Tabnine.