This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You may contact Uber here with questions about Uber's use of your data for purposes of automated decision making, including regarding the factors considered... to request review of any such decisions by Uber personnel.
If this changes, we will update this Privacy Policy and provide appropriate safeguards as required by applicable law.
Opt-out of profiling/automated decision making. You can opt-out of automated processing or profiling performed on personal information to evaluate, analyze, or predict personal aspects...
"Not be subject to automated decision-making producing legal or significant effects on an individual, which we do not engage in.Excerpt from Starbucks's Privacy Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Not be subject to automated decision-making producing legal or significant effects on an individual, which we do not engage in.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.