This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The substantive rights and remedies available to a customer upon objecting to a sub-processor are entirely determined by the customer's individual DPA, not by this document.
The reader's rights and options after submitting a sub-processor objection are governed exclusively by their DPA with Snowflake.
How other platforms handle this
If your account is terminated by you or by Tinder for any reason, these Terms continue and remain enforceable between you and Tinder, and you will not be entitled to any refund for purchases made.
These Terms and the licenses granted hereunder may be assigned by the Company but may not be assigned by you without the prior express written consent of the Company.
These Terms may not be assigned or transferred by you except with our prior written consent.
"Objections shall be handled as described in your DPA.Excerpt from Snowflake's Sub-Processors
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The substantive rights and remedies available to a customer upon objecting to a sub-processor are entirely determined by the customer's individual DPA, not by this document.
The reader's rights and options after submitting a sub-processor objection are governed exclusively by their DPA with Snowflake.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 297 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.