Provision record
Snowflake · Snowflake Sub-Processors · View original document ↗

Sub-processor objections handled per DPA terms

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 298 of 352 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

How must sub-processor objections be handled?
“Objections shall be handled as described in your DPA.”
Version CA-V-006917, captured Sept. 12, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Snowflake requires that sub-processor objections be handled as described in the customer's DPA.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Snowflake and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The substantive rights and remedies available to a customer upon objecting to a sub-processor are entirely determined by the customer's individual DPA, not by this document.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The reader's rights and options after submitting a sub-processor objection are governed exclusively by their DPA with Snowflake.

How other platforms handle this

Pinterest Medium

To the extent that any provisions in the Business Terms of Service conflict with these Terms, the Business Terms of Service shall govern to the extent of the conflict.

Snapchat Medium

Regardless of who terminates these Terms, both you and Snap continue to be bound by Sections 2, 3 (to the extent any additional terms and conditions would, by their terms, survive), and 6 - 25 of the Terms.

Twitch Medium

The Terms of Service, which incorporate the Guidelines, is the entire agreement between you and Twitch relating to the subject matter herein and will not be modified except by a writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Objections shall be handled as described in your DPA.

Excerpt from Snowflake's Sub-Processors

Provision details

Document information
Document
Snowflake Sub-Processors
Entity
Snowflake
Date stated by the document
March 6, 2026
As printed in Snowflake’s text (version CA-V-006917), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 6, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006917, captured Sept. 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-069651
Document ID
CA-D-000936
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006917)
d51735989fab5f85ed25b096a0433cf8a9be25d9b04bc1593f2032eaa305ee8c
Analysis generated
July 6, 2026 23:26 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found verbatim in version CA-V-006917 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Snowflake
Document: Snowflake Sub-Processors
Record ID: CA-P-069651
Version: CA-V-006917
Captured: 2026-09-12 01:21:23 UTC
SHA-256: d51735989fab5f85…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/snowflake/snowflake-sub-processors/provision/CA-P-069651/sub-processor-objections-handled-per-dpa-terms/
Accessed: Oct. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Snowflake's Sub-processor objections handled per DPA terms clause do?

The substantive rights and remedies available to a customer upon objecting to a sub-processor are entirely determined by the customer's individual DPA, not by this document.

How does this clause affect you?

The reader's rights and options after submitting a sub-processor objection are governed exclusively by their DPA with Snowflake.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 298 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Snowflake?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.