Provision record
Samsung · Samsung Terms of Service · View original document ↗

New York Courts Have Exclusive Non-Arbitration Jurisdiction

Common · 263 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Samsung and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Samsung's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Booking.com

Any disputes or claims not subject to arbitration, as set forth in this section, will be resolved exclusively in the federal or state courts of New York, New York, and you and we consent to personal jurisdiction in those courts.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
...the state and federal courts of New York County, New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claims (except for claims heard in small claims court) that are not subject to arbitration...

Excerpt from Samsung's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Samsung Terms of Service
Entity
Samsung
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 12, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004811, captured July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-075413
Document ID
CA-D-000570
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004811)
2c07de374b9f12fd4ba59a3d2de4485ea32b24a52e8de04777ac48038904a66c
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004811, captured July 12, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Samsung
Document: Samsung Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-075413
Version: CA-V-004811
Captured: 2026-07-12 22:06:47 UTC
SHA-256: 2c07de374b9f12fd…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/samsung/samsung-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-075413/new-york-courts-have-exclusive-non-arbitration-jurisdiction/
Accessed: Nov. 3, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Samsung's New York Courts Have Exclusive Non-Arbitration Jurisdiction clause do?

The clause states: “...the state and federal courts of New York County, New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claims (except for claims heard in small claims court) that are not subject to arbitration...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 263 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Samsung?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Samsung.