Provision record
Runway · Runway Usage Policy · View original document ↗

Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Runway and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using another person's image, video, or audio without their permission as an input or basis for content generation on Runway's platform.

This analysis describes what Runway's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision engages right of publicity law, biometric privacy statutes, and personality rights frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and is operationally relevant for enterprise users generating synthetic media that incorporates real individuals' likenesses or voices.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, uploading or using another person's image, video, or audio without their consent to generate content via Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. The prohibition applies regardless of whether the resulting content is distributed externally.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Use of an image, video, or audio of another person without their permission

Excerpt from Runway's Usage Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This prohibition engages right of publicity statutes in states including California (Civil Code Section 3344), New York, and Tennessee's ELVIS Act, which specifically addresses AI-generated voice replication.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
Runway Usage Policy
Entity
Runway
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016467
Document ID
CA-D-00773
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c85a33b83012d26c721d121f95a781982f488e98734ee73463ec44474f4eb9b0
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:38 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Runway
Document: Runway Usage Policy
Record ID: CA-P-016467
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:38:40 UTC
SHA-256: c85a33b83012d26c…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/runway/runway-usage-policy/provision/CA-P-016467/use-of-another-persons-image-video-or-audio-without-permission/
Accessed: Sept. 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Runway's Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission clause do?

This provision engages right of publicity law, biometric privacy statutes, and personality rights frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and is operationally relevant for enterprise users generating synthetic media that incorporates real individuals' likenesses or voices.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, uploading or using another person's image, video, or audio without their consent to generate content via Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. The prohibition applies regardless of whether the resulting content is distributed externally.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Runway?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Runway.