Runway · Runway Usage Policy · View original document ↗

Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Runway changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Runway recorded 10 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Get same-day alerts →
Monitor governance changes for Runway Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using another person's image, video, or audio without their permission as an input or basis for content generation on Runway's platform.

This analysis describes what Runway's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision engages right of publicity law, biometric privacy statutes, and personality rights frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and is operationally relevant for enterprise users generating synthetic media that incorporates real individuals' likenesses or voices.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, uploading or using another person's image, video, or audio without their consent to generate content via Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. The prohibition applies regardless of whether the resulting content is distributed externally.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Runway has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Use of an image, video, or audio of another person without their permission

Excerpt from Runway's Usage Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This prohibition engages right of publicity statutes in states including California (Civil Code Section 3344), New York, and Tennessee's ELVIS Act, which specifically addresses AI-generated voice replication. Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) may engage if voice or facial geometry data is processed. The EU's GDPR engages where biometric data is processed, and the AI Act addresses AI systems generating synthetic content of identifiable individuals. The FTC's Impersonation Rule and Section 5 authority are also relevant. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The use of real individuals' likenesses and voices in AI-generated content is a high-priority enforcement and litigation area. Multiple lawsuits against AI platforms regarding unauthorized use of individuals' voices and likenesses are currently proceeding. The ELVIS Act and similar state-level statutes create specific private rights of action that may apply independently of Runway's policy. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Illinois BIPA creates significant statutory damages exposure for biometric data processing without consent. California, Tennessee, and New York have enacted or strengthened right of publicity protections for AI-generated likenesses and voices. EU GDPR biometric data provisions impose explicit consent requirements for processing biometric data. Enterprise users with global audiences face a patchwork of applicable requirements. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers generating AI content involving real individuals' images, voices, or likenesses should assess whether consent documentation is required under applicable state and federal law, independent of and in addition to compliance with Runway's policy. Vendor assessments should confirm that Runway's detection mechanisms for unauthorized likeness use are technically documented. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should establish consent documentation workflows for any use case involving real individuals' images, audio, or video as inputs to Runway's tools. Legal teams should map applicable right of publicity, biometric privacy, and GDPR consent requirements to specific use cases and jurisdictions before deploying Runway in commercial content production contexts.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices involving unauthorized use of individuals' likenesses in AI-generated commercial content.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general have enforcement authority under right of publicity and biometric privacy statutes in multiple jurisdictions including Illinois (BIPA) and California.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Runway Usage Policy
Entity
Runway
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016467
Document ID
CA-D-00773
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c85a33b83012d26c721d121f95a781982f488e98734ee73463ec44474f4eb9b0
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:38 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Runway
Document: Runway Usage Policy
Record ID: CA-P-016467
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:38:40 UTC
SHA-256: c85a33b83012d26c…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/runway/runway-usage-policy/provision/CA-P-016467/use-of-another-persons-image-video-or-audio-without-permission/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Runway's Use of Another Person's Image, Video, or Audio Without Permission clause do?

This provision engages right of publicity law, biometric privacy statutes, and personality rights frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and is operationally relevant for enterprise users generating synthetic media that incorporates real individuals' likenesses or voices.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, uploading or using another person's image, video, or audio without their consent to generate content via Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. The prohibition applies regardless of whether the resulting content is distributed externally.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Runway?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Runway.