Users and Rumble may only bring claims against each other on an individual basis and may not act as a plaintiff or class member in any class or representative proceeding.
This analysis describes what Rumble's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision, in conjunction with the mandatory arbitration clause, requires that any claims against Rumble be pursued individually rather than collectively, regardless of whether multiple users may share the same grievance.
Interpretive note: Enforceability varies by jurisdiction; EU residents and California consumers may have statutory protections that limit or override class action waivers in consumer contracts.
The agreement requires that users bring any claims against Rumble solely in their individual capacity, precluding participation in class action or representative proceedings regardless of the nature of the claim.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
WHERE PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE LAW, YOU AND NETFLIX AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless ...
Monitoring
Rumble has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"YOU AND RUMBLE AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING.— Excerpt from Rumble's Rumble Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Class action waivers in consumer contracts have been subject to regulatory and judicial scrutiny under the FTC Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Act, and various state consumer protection statutes. California courts have in some circumstances declined to enforce class action waivers that effectively preclude consumers from vindicating statutory rights. The EU's Unfair Contract Terms Directive and the Representative Actions Directive may render class action waivers in consumer contracts unenforceable against EU residents. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. If the class action waiver is unenforceable in a given jurisdiction, it could expose Rumble to collective litigation from users in that jurisdiction. Conversely, if enforceable, it limits the practical ability of individual users to pursue small-value claims. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: California, EU/EEA, and certain other jurisdictions present heightened enforceability risk for class action waivers in consumer contracts. Minors and protected consumer categories may have additional grounds for challenge. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Institutional partners or advertisers should assess whether the class action waiver in user terms creates any indirect effect on commercial dispute resolution mechanisms applicable to their own agreements with Rumble. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should monitor regulatory developments regarding class action waivers in consumer contracts, particularly FTC rulemaking activity and state-level legislative changes in California, New York, and Illinois.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision, in conjunction with the mandatory arbitration clause, requires that any claims against Rumble be pursued individually rather than collectively, regardless of whether multiple users may share the same grievance.
The agreement requires that users bring any claims against Rumble solely in their individual capacity, precluding participation in class action or representative proceedings regardless of the nature of the claim.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 86 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Rumble.