Under Options A and B, creators appoint Rumble as their attorney-in-fact with sole control over all litigation decisions, including settlement, in connection with the creator's content, and consent in advance to being named as plaintiff in enforcement actions if required by law.
This analysis describes what Rumble's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision grants Rumble sole decision-making authority over legal proceedings, demands, and settlements involving the creator's content under Options A and B, including the right to settle claims without the creator's consent and to retain any damages recovered, while binding the creator to cooperation obligations and to being named in litigation without additional consent.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of an irrevocable attorney-in-fact appointment with this scope varies by jurisdiction; common law requirements for powers of attorney coupled with an interest and applicable statutory frameworks in Canada, U.S. states, and EU member states may limit or condition the application of this provision.
The updated terms define additional types of advertisements that may appear in Rumble Premium subscription content. Previously, the terms stated that Premium content may contain 'live read advertisements.' The revised language now explicitly permits 'live and previously recorded host-read sponsorships and advertisements, as well as advertisements that aired during the original run of the content, and native placement advertisements,' which may include boosted content, homepage advertisements, and related videos. The change does not restrict Premium content but instead clarifies and expands the disclosed categories of permitted ads. Premium subscribers should review these updated definitions to understand the full scope of advertising they may encounter.
View change record →This clause establishes that under Options A and B, Rumble holds sole control over all legal actions, settlements, and enforcement proceedings related to submitted content, and the agreement states that creators consent in advance to being named as plaintiffs in any enforcement action where applicable law requires it. Creators do not retain the right to approve or reject settlements under the terms as written.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Attorney-in-Fact Appointment and Litigation Control and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"You hereby appoint Rumble as your (or if you are entering into this Agreement under authority of a third-party rights holder, that third-party's) attorney in fact for executing any instrument or document or taking any step in furtherance of the rights granted herein. Where Rumble as Agent takes steps to enforce the copyright in your Content or breach of a license agreement on your behalf as Principal... Rumble shall have sole control and decision-making power over any demand, claim, proceeding or settlement. If required by applicable law that you be a named plaintiff in any such enforcement action relating to your Content, you hereby so consent to be so named.Excerpt from Rumble's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The attorney-in-fact appointment and power of attorney granted to Rumble engages applicable law governing powers of attorney in Canada and the United States, which may impose requirements for specificity, revocability, and capacity.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision grants Rumble sole decision-making authority over legal proceedings, demands, and settlements involving the creator's content under Options A and B, including the right to settle claims without the creator's consent and to retain any damages recovered, while binding the creator to cooperation obligations and to being named in litigation without additional consent.
This clause establishes that under Options A and B, Rumble holds sole control over all legal actions, settlements, and enforcement proceedings related to submitted content, and the agreement states that creators consent in advance to being named as plaintiffs in any enforcement action where applicable law requires it. Creators do not retain the right to approve or reject settlements under …
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Rumble.