You agree to resolve disputes with Riot Games only on an individual basis and give up the right to participate in any class action or group lawsuit.
This analysis describes what Riot Games's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes the procedural structure for dispute resolution by limiting arbitration proceedings to individual claimants. The provision prevents the arbitrator from aggregating claims across multiple users into consolidated or class-wide proceedings.
This provision strips consumers of collective legal power, making it economically impractical to challenge Riot Games over small financial losses such as wrongful charges or improperly deleted virtual items.
How other platforms handle this
You and OpenAI agree to resolve any disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms or our Services through final and binding individual arbitration, except that either party may bring an individual claim in small claims court. You agree to waive your right to a jury trial and to participate in a...
If you are a U.S. user, you and Tinder agree that each of us may bring claims against the other only on an individual basis and not as a plaintiff or class member in any purported class or representative action or proceeding. Unless both you and Tinder agree otherwise, the arbitrator may not consoli...
Any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof or the use of the Services (collectively, 'Disputes') will be settled by binding arbitration between you and Wise, except that each party retains...
Monitoring
Riot Games has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"You and Riot Games agree that each of us may bring Claims against the other only on an individual basis. Unless both you and Riot Games agree otherwise, the arbitrator may not consolidate or join more than one person's or party's Claims and may not otherwise preside over any form of a consolidated, representative, or class proceeding.— Excerpt from Riot Games's Riot Games Terms of Service
Class action waivers in consumer contracts face increasing regulatory scrutiny from the CFPB and FTC and are unenforceable in several EU member states. This provision requires careful jurisdictional analysis for global compliance programs.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes the procedural structure for dispute resolution by limiting arbitration proceedings to individual claimants. The provision prevents the arbitrator from aggregating claims across multiple users into consolidated or class-wide proceedings.
This provision strips consumers of collective legal power, making it economically impractical to challenge Riot Games over small financial losses such as wrongful charges or improperly deleted virtual items.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 74 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Riot Games.