Provision record
Riot Games · Riot Games Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Bad-faith arbitration may result in cost sanctions

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Riot Games and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Riot Games's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Credit Karma

you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated

Anyscale

Payment of all filing, administration, and arbitrator fees will be governed by the AAA's rules, unless otherwise stated in this Arbitration Agreement.

Target

If we make any future changes to this arbitration agreement (other than a change to our contact information), you may reject any such change by sending your personally signed, written notice to the following address within 30 days of the change: Target Law Department...with a clear statement that yo...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
if you assert a Claim in bad faith or without a sufficient basis, or if you break the Rules while arbitrating, Riot Games may ask the arbitrator to impose sanctions on you...

Excerpt from Riot Games's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Riot Games Terms of Service
Entity
Riot Games
Date stated by the document
Dec. 1, 2024
As printed in Riot Games’s text (version CA-V-000805), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-000805, captured April 19, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-038668
Document ID
CA-D-000309
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-000805)
98ee652042a3389adce6ccb931e83315f728198782587a11d981377121c2ad11
Analysis generated
April 28, 2026 05:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-000805, captured April 19, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Riot Games
Document: Riot Games Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-038668
Version: CA-V-000805
Captured: 2026-04-19 06:28:28 UTC
SHA-256: 98ee652042a3389a…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/riot-games/riot-games-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-038668/bad-faith-arbitration-may-result-in-cost-sanctions/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Riot Games's Bad-faith arbitration may result in cost sanctions clause do?

The clause states: “if you assert a Claim in bad faith or without a sufficient basis, or if you break the Rules while arbitrating, Riot Games may ask the arbitrator to impose sanctions on you...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Riot Games?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Riot Games.