Provision record
Ring · Ring Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Small Claims Court Exception to Arbitration

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Ring and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Ring's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

This section does not require informal dispute resolution or arbitration of the following claims: (i) individual claims brought in small claims court...

Target

either you or Target may bring or take an individual claim in or to a small claims court...you agree that you or Target may bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin infringement or other misuse of intellectual property rights...

Credit Karma

The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and not appealable, and judgment on the arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
either party may elect to proceed in small claims court in your county of residence within the U.S. if the Dispute qualifies

Excerpt from Ring's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Ring Terms of Service
Entity
Ring
Date stated by the document
Nov. 6, 2025
As printed in Ring’s text (version CA-V-001263), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-001263, captured May 5, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-049364
Document ID
CA-D-000580
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-001263)
b3e4739fb07638705c2d0e2afac9d36ab4ed9e55917583b152de6cb6a53459be
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 23:06 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-001263, captured May 5, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Ring
Document: Ring Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-049364
Version: CA-V-001263
Captured: 2026-05-05 06:18:44 UTC
SHA-256: b3e4739fb0763870…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/ring/ring-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-049364/small-claims-court-exception-to-arbitration/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Ring's Small Claims Court Exception to Arbitration clause do?

The clause states: “either party may elect to proceed in small claims court in your county of residence within the U.S. if the Dispute qualifies”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Ring?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ring.