“fully automated decision-making, including profiling, with respect to an individual or group of individuals which produces legal effects concerning such individual(s) or similarly significantly affects such individual(s)”
This analysis describes what Replicate's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This prohibition limits use cases involving automated determinations about people — such as credit scoring or employment screening — that carry significant real-world consequences.
Interpretive note: The excerpt does not include surrounding language establishing the prohibition; it reads as a definition or list item rather than a standalone prohibition clause. The canonical claim reflects the evident purpose of the language as a prohibited use, but the framing of the broader provision is not visible in the quoted text.
The reader cannot use the Services for any fully automated decision-making, including profiling, where the output produces legal effects or similarly significant effects on individuals or groups.
How other platforms handle this
If this changes, we will update this Privacy Policy and provide appropriate safeguards as required by applicable law.
You may contact Uber here with questions about Uber's use of your data for purposes of automated decision making, including regarding the factors considered... to request review of any such decisions by Uber personnel.
Our Chatbots may generate outputs that are inaccurate or inappropriate for your situation, so you should not rely solely on their answers. You should always verify the accuracy of such information
"fully automated decision-making, including profiling, with respect to an individual or group of individuals which produces legal effects concerning such individual(s) or similarly significantly affects such individual(s)Excerpt from Replicate's Terms of Service
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This prohibition limits use cases involving automated determinations about people — such as credit scoring or employment screening — that carry significant real-world consequences.
The reader cannot use the Services for any fully automated decision-making, including profiling, where the output produces legal effects or similarly significant effects on individuals or groups.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Replicate.