“you and we each agree to resolve any claim, dispute, or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Service through binding arbitration or, for qualifying claims, in small claims court.”
This analysis describes what Pinterest's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Mandatory binding arbitration removes access to ordinary courts for most disputes, and arbitration outcomes are generally final and subject to very limited appeal rights.
Users cannot sue Pinterest in a regular court for disputes arising from the Terms or the Service; they are limited to binding arbitration or, if their claim qualifies, small claims court.
How other platforms handle this
If you use the Anyscale Services on behalf of a business or organization, You and Anyscale agree to resolve any dispute, claim, or controversy...pursuant to Section 10.5.
If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"you and we each agree to resolve any claim, dispute, or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Service through binding arbitration or, for qualifying claims, in small claims court.Excerpt from Pinterest's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Mandatory binding arbitration removes access to ordinary courts for most disputes, and arbitration outcomes are generally final and subject to very limited appeal rights.
Users cannot sue Pinterest in a regular court for disputes arising from the Terms or the Service; they are limited to binding arbitration or, if their claim qualifies, small claims court.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pinterest.