This analysis describes what Pika's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Recipient may disclose Discloser's Confidential Information: (i) to the extent that such disclosure is required by applicable law or by the order of a court...provided that...the Recipient promptly notifies the Discloser in writing of such required disclosure...
Consistent with applicable law, you understand and agree that Tinder may not share information with you regarding your account termination if doing so would potentially impair the safety or privacy of other users.
within the Services, all discussion boards, groups, or other public forums available to participants are publicly visible to other participants.
"Where required by applicable law, including the EU Digital Services Act, we may provide transparency regarding how Outputs are generated, how moderation decisions are made, and how recommender systems operate.Excerpt from Pika's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Where required by applicable law, including the EU Digital Services Act, we may provide transparency regarding how Outputs are generated, how moderation decisions are made, and how recommender systems operate.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 273 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pika.