This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you (a) retain your ownership rights in Input...
As between the Parties, Customer or its licensors retain all right, title and interest (including any and all Intellectual Property Rights) in and to the Customer Property and any modifications made thereto...
You retain all ownership rights in your Customer Content subject to any license or other rights granted herein.
"As between Perplexity and Customer, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, Customer (i) retains all ownership rights in Input...Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity API Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “As between Perplexity and Customer, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, Customer (i) retains all ownership rights in Input...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 250 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.