Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what NVIDIA NIM's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either Party may seek injunctive relief in any court of appropriate jurisdiction with respect to any alleged breach of such Party's Intellectual Property Rights, breaches of Confidentiality...
This choice of jurisdiction does not prevent Cohere from seeking injunctive relief with respect to a violation of intellectual property rights or confidentiality obligations in any appropriate jurisdiction.
Any claim for injunctive relief with respect to a violation of section D.9 may be brought in any jurisdiction.
Monitoring
NVIDIA NIM has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"...except that either party may apply for injunctive remedies or an equivalent type of urgent legal relief in any jurisdiction.Excerpt from NVIDIA NIM's Terms of Use
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “...except that either party may apply for injunctive remedies or an equivalent type of urgent legal relief in any jurisdiction.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NVIDIA NIM.