Provision record
NVIDIA NIM · NVIDIA NIM Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Low severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 267 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track NVIDIA NIM and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Disputes about this agreement are governed by Delaware law and must be brought in courts in Santa Clara County, California.

This analysis describes what NVIDIA NIM's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The agreement requires that legal disputes be resolved in Santa Clara County, California, which may be geographically and financially impractical for international or non-California-based licensees.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the exclusive Santa Clara County forum selection clause against EU/EEA-based licensees is uncertain under Brussels I Recast and national procedural law frameworks.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 12, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1500 other provisions on other platforms.

Change history

removed Jul 18, 2026

Removal of explicit governing law and jurisdiction clause may indicate relocation to different section or different dispute resolution framework.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Organizations outside California that have disputes with NVIDIA under this agreement are required by the terms to litigate in Santa Clara County courts, which may create practical barriers to dispute resolution for international or geographically distant licensees.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.

Instacart Medium

For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware

Plaid Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws principles. Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in Santa Clara County, California.

Excerpt from NVIDIA NIM's Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Mandatory forum selection clauses are generally enforceable in U.S.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
NVIDIA NIM Terms of Use
Entity
NVIDIA NIM
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011930
Document ID
CA-D-00808
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
88f31051d3b38a1648258ebc55a1ff1ab39b62cf74a7a304f40ca718785a0773
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 16:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: NVIDIA NIM
Document: NVIDIA NIM Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-011930
Captured: 2026-05-12 16:17:24 UTC
SHA-256: 88f31051d3b38a16…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/nvidia-nim/nvidia-nim-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-011930/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: Aug. 11, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does NVIDIA NIM's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

The agreement requires that legal disputes be resolved in Santa Clara County, California, which may be geographically and financially impractical for international or non-California-based licensees.

How does this clause affect you?

Organizations outside California that have disputes with NVIDIA under this agreement are required by the terms to litigate in Santa Clara County courts, which may create practical barriers to dispute resolution for international or geographically distant licensees.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with NVIDIA NIM?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NVIDIA NIM.