Provision record
NVIDIA NIM · NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Bypassing AI Safety Controls

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 142 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track NVIDIA NIM and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Users are not permitted to attempt to disable or work around any of NVIDIA's built-in content filters or safety restrictions within its AI services.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what NVIDIA NIM's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This clause prohibits prompt injection, jailbreaking, or other technical methods designed to cause the AI to produce outputs that its safety controls would otherwise prevent, and violations constitute grounds for account termination.

⚠

Interpretive note: The document does not define whether authorized security research or red-teaming activities conducted by enterprise customers fall within the scope of prohibited circumvention.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Developers building applications on NIM who test the limits of the model's safety controls, even for red-teaming or security research purposes, may be at risk of violating this provision depending on how NVIDIA interprets 'circumvention.'

How other platforms handle this

Microsoft Azure Medium

Microsoft uses the resulting text data to provide captioning of chat for players who need it. This data may also be used to provide a safe gaming environment and enforce the Community Standards for Xb...

Eufy Medium

You must not submit any user content to Anker's Services that is or has ever been the subject of any threatened or actual legal proceedings or other similar complaints.

DoorDash Medium

you will not provide a Rating or Review for any Merchant or business for which you have an ownership interest, employment relationship, or other affiliation...you will not submit a Rating or Review in exchange for payment, free food items, or other benefits

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not use the Services to circumvent, disable, or otherwise interfere with safety-related features or restrictions of the Services, including content filtering mechanisms or usage restrictions.

Excerpt from NVIDIA NIM's NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the EU AI Act's requirements for general-purpose AI model providers to maintain technical safeguards and document their safety measures.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA

Provision details

Document information
Document
NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP
Entity
NVIDIA NIM
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011963
Document ID
CA-D-00821
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
41d8df21537bcb19cecceb53970dcae928102707e3b71a722cc1b090cbf6a1c6
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 16:37 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: NVIDIA NIM
Document: NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP
Record ID: CA-P-011963
Captured: 2026-05-12 16:37:18 UTC
SHA-256: 41d8df21537bcb19…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/nvidia-nim/nvidia-ai-foundation-models-aup/provision/CA-P-011963/prohibition-on-bypassing-ai-safety-controls/
Accessed: Sept. 26, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does NVIDIA NIM's Prohibition on Bypassing AI Safety Controls clause do?

This clause prohibits prompt injection, jailbreaking, or other technical methods designed to cause the AI to produce outputs that its safety controls would otherwise prevent, and violations constitute grounds for account termination.

How does this clause affect you?

Developers building applications on NIM who test the limits of the model's safety controls, even for red-teaming or security research purposes, may be at risk of violating this provision depending on how NVIDIA interprets 'circumvention.'

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 142 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with NVIDIA NIM?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NVIDIA NIM.