Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The terms state that users who attempt to violate Community Guidelines using the Editor tool will face suspension or permanent banning and will not receive a refund for any amounts paid.
This analysis describes what Midjourney's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision links Editor misuse to a specific financial consequence: forfeiture of paid subscription or service fees upon enforcement action. The no-refund condition applies to attempted violations, not solely completed ones, and is stated without a documented appeal mechanism in this policy.
Under this clause, users suspended or banned for Editor-related guideline violations forfeit any fees paid, including potentially unused subscription time, with no refund provided. The policy applies this consequence to attempts to violate guidelines, not solely to completed violations.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle No Refund on Editor Suspension or Ban and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Midjourney has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"Anyone attempting to violate our Community Guidelines using the Editor will face suspension or banning without refund.Excerpt from Midjourney's Community Guidelines
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The no-refund-on-ban provision may interact with consumer protection frameworks in the EU under the Consumer Rights Directive and in the UK under the Consumer Rights Act, which provide statutory rights to refunds in certain circumstances that may not be contractually waivable. US state consumer protection laws, particularly in California, may impose constraints on blanket no-refund policies tied to discretionary enforcement. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The application of the no-refund consequence to attempted violations (rather than completed violations) creates an enforcement standard where the financial penalty may attach before a clear harm is established, which may face regulatory scrutiny in jurisdictions with mandatory refund rights. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users have heightened exposure given statutory refund rights that may supersede contractual no-refund clauses. California's consumer protection framework may impose additional constraints. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise accounts managing user access to Midjourney's Editor should assess whether downstream employees generating policy-violating content could trigger no-refund enforcement at the account level. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams in EU, UK, and Australian jurisdictions should assess whether this no-refund clause is enforceable as written or whether statutory consumer rights supersede it. Internal policies for platforms deploying the Editor should clearly communicate this financial consequence to authorized users.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This provision links Editor misuse to a specific financial consequence: forfeiture of paid subscription or service fees upon enforcement action. The no-refund condition applies to attempted violations, not solely completed ones, and is stated without a documented appeal mechanism in this policy.
Under this clause, users suspended or banned for Editor-related guideline violations forfeit any fees paid, including potentially unused subscription time, with no refund provided. The policy applies this consequence to attempts to violate guidelines, not solely to completed violations.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Midjourney.