Provision record
Midjourney · Midjourney Community Guidelines · View original document ↗

No Refund on Editor Suspension or Ban

Medium severity High confidence Explicit document language Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Midjourney and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The terms state that users who attempt to violate Community Guidelines using the Editor tool will face suspension or permanent banning and will not receive a refund for any amounts paid.

This analysis describes what Midjourney's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision links Editor misuse to a specific financial consequence: forfeiture of paid subscription or service fees upon enforcement action. The no-refund condition applies to attempted violations, not solely completed ones, and is stated without a documented appeal mechanism in this policy.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
4
Months Monitored
Jul 9, 2026
First Seen
Jul 9, 2026
Last Seen

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, users suspended or banned for Editor-related guideline violations forfeit any fees paid, including potentially unused subscription time, with no refund provided. The policy applies this consequence to attempts to violate guidelines, not solely to completed violations.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle No Refund on Editor Suspension or Ban and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Anyone attempting to violate our Community Guidelines using the Editor will face suspension or banning without refund.

Excerpt from Midjourney's Community Guidelines

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The no-refund-on-ban provision may interact with consumer protection frameworks in the EU under the Consumer Rights Directive and in the UK under the Consumer Rights Act, which provide statutory rights to refunds …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
Midjourney Community Guidelines
Entity
Midjourney
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 11, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013654
Document ID
CA-D-00759
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
d9b4367b32e6742f44f1cdb90bf33fe5e3840df3137cc755b0149157155311d3
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 12:38 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Midjourney
Document: Midjourney Community Guidelines
Record ID: CA-P-013654
Captured: 2026-05-11 12:38:46 UTC
SHA-256: d9b4367b32e6742f…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/midjourney/midjourney-community-guidelines/provision/CA-P-013654/no-refund-on-editor-suspension-or-ban/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Midjourney's No Refund on Editor Suspension or Ban clause do?

This provision links Editor misuse to a specific financial consequence: forfeiture of paid subscription or service fees upon enforcement action. The no-refund condition applies to attempted violations, not solely completed ones, and is stated without a documented appeal mechanism in this policy.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, users suspended or banned for Editor-related guideline violations forfeit any fees paid, including potentially unused subscription time, with no refund provided. The policy applies this consequence to attempts to violate guidelines, not solely to completed violations.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Midjourney?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Midjourney.