This analysis describes what Meta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
User ownership of Inputs and Outputs is qualified by applicable law, meaning ownership may not be absolute if local law limits it, and the provision does not affect Meta's separately granted rights to use Content.
The updated terms remove developer restrictions that previously applied to large-scale platforms, meaning companies with more than 700 million monthly active users can now access Meta's AI models without special permission. The terms also eliminate the restriction on EU developers accessing multimodal models and consolidate account management under either managed accounts or Meta accounts. Developers previously subject to these restrictions should review whether the updated terms now permit their use case.
View change record →The updated terms authorize Meta to retain user-submitted content if its systems flag the content for a potential policy violation, in addition to retention tied to legal compliance and contractual rights. This expands the circumstances under which content may be preserved without explicit time limits. Under the revised language, content retention decisions may now be driven by automated policy-violation flagging in addition to legal or contractual necessity. Developers integrating the Llama API should understand that flagged content may be retained indefinitely pending policy review.
View change record →The reader retains ownership of their Inputs and Outputs as against Meta, subject to what applicable law permits, though this does not restrict rights Meta may have been separately granted elsewhere in the Terms.
How other platforms handle this
You do not have any rights in relation to Member Content, and, unless expressly authorized by Tinder, you may only use Member Content to the extent that your use is consistent with our Services' purpose...
As between you and Stability, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you retain your ownership right in the Inputs that you submit.
By using the services and attending/participating in such audio/video events you agree to any such recordings and agree that all rights, titles, and interests in such recordings will vest in Glassdoor.
Monitoring
Meta has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Between you and Meta, to the extent permitted by applicable law, you own all rights, title, and interests in and to your Inputs and Outputs...and Meta does not claim any ownership of your Content.— Excerpt from Meta's Llama API Terms of Service
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
User ownership of Inputs and Outputs is qualified by applicable law, meaning ownership may not be absolute if local law limits it, and the provision does not affect Meta's separately granted rights to use Content.
The reader retains ownership of their Inputs and Outputs as against Meta, subject to what applicable law permits, though this does not restrict rights Meta may have been separately granted elsewhere in the Terms.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 257 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Meta.