Provision record
LexisNexis · LexisNexis Terms · View original document ↗

User consents to personal jurisdiction in Ohio courts

High severity Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 271 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time LexisNexis changes these terms. Follow LexisNexis →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for LexisNexis Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow LexisNexis →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what LexisNexis's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.

Netflix Medium

you consent as part of these Terms to venue for such cases exclusively in these courts.

Perplexity AI Medium

it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

LexisNexis has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow LexisNexis → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
by using this Web Site you hereby consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of litigating any such action.

Excerpt from LexisNexis's Terms

Provision details

Document information
Document
LexisNexis Terms
Entity
LexisNexis
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073276
Document ID
CA-D-00717
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
0c6a8d35d65202c5a7c1e48deb6d5bc2d5733a86da462e7d1a89ee3a167de54f
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 16:10 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: LexisNexis
Document: LexisNexis Terms
Record ID: CA-P-073276
Captured: 2026-07-12 16:10:48 UTC
SHA-256: 0c6a8d35d65202c5…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/lexisnexis/lexisnexis-terms/provision/CA-P-073276/user-consents-to-personal-jurisdiction-in-ohio-courts/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does LexisNexis's User consents to personal jurisdiction in Ohio courts clause do?

The clause states: “by using this Web Site you hereby consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of litigating any such action.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 271 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with LexisNexis?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LexisNexis.