Provision record
LexisNexis · LexisNexis Terms · View original document ↗

Ohio Exclusive Jurisdiction and Governing Law

Medium confidence Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track LexisNexis and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

All disputes arising from these Terms of Use are governed by Ohio law and must be litigated exclusively in state or federal courts in Montgomery County, Ohio. Users consent to personal jurisdiction in those courts by using the website.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what LexisNexis's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This provision requires users outside Ohio to litigate any claims in Montgomery County, Ohio, which may create a practical barrier to pursuing legal claims depending on the user's location and the nature of the dispute.

⚠

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the exclusive Ohio forum clause against non-Ohio consumers, particularly those in states with strong consumer protection statutes or EU/UK users, may vary by jurisdiction.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Under section 21, any legal action related to these Terms of Use must be filed in state or federal courts in Montgomery County, Ohio, governed by Ohio law, regardless of the user's location.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Ohio Exclusive Jurisdiction and Governing Law and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The Terms of Use are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio and any action arising out of or relating to these terms shall be filed only in state or federal courts located in Montgomery County, Ohio, and by using this Web Site you hereby consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of litigating any such action.

Excerpt from LexisNexis's Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Exclusive forum selection clauses in consumer-facing online agreements interact with applicable state consumer protection statutes and, in some jurisdictions, may not be fully enforceable against consumers who did not meaningfully negotiate the …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
LexisNexis Terms
Entity
LexisNexis
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004772, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-074389
Document ID
CA-D-000717
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004772)
2ca5358974c7d0ffa52fda01435681e4bc7e5de82cbe99bc76ca285bb484e1c9
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 16:10 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004772, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: LexisNexis
Document: LexisNexis Terms
Record ID: CA-P-074389
Version: CA-V-004772
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:47:41 UTC
SHA-256: 2ca5358974c7d0ff…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/lexisnexis/lexisnexis-terms/provision/CA-P-074389/ohio-exclusive-jurisdiction-and-governing-law/
Accessed: Nov. 10, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does LexisNexis's Ohio Exclusive Jurisdiction and Governing Law clause do?

This provision requires users outside Ohio to litigate any claims in Montgomery County, Ohio, which may create a practical barrier to pursuing legal claims depending on the user's location and the nature of the dispute.

How does this clause affect you?

Under section 21, any legal action related to these Terms of Use must be filed in state or federal courts in Montgomery County, Ohio, governed by Ohio law, regardless of the user's location.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with LexisNexis?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LexisNexis.