Provision record
LexisNexis · LexisNexis Terms · View original document ↗

User consents to personal jurisdiction in Ohio courts

Common · 263 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track LexisNexis and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what LexisNexis's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Target

You and Target consent to the jurisdiction of those courts and waive any objections as to personal jurisdiction or as to the laying of venue in such courts due to (1) inconvenient forum or (2) any other basis...

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The Terms of Use are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio and any action arising out of or relating to these terms shall be filed only in state or federal courts located in Montgomery County, Ohio, and by using this Web Site you hereby consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of litigating any such action.

Excerpt from LexisNexis's Terms

Provision details

Document information
Document
LexisNexis Terms
Entity
LexisNexis
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004772, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073276
Document ID
CA-D-000717
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004772)
2ca5358974c7d0ffa52fda01435681e4bc7e5de82cbe99bc76ca285bb484e1c9
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 16:10 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004772, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 6, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: LexisNexis
Document: LexisNexis Terms
Record ID: CA-P-073276
Version: CA-V-004772
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:47:41 UTC
SHA-256: 2ca5358974c7d0ff…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/lexisnexis/lexisnexis-terms/provision/CA-P-073276/user-consents-to-personal-jurisdiction-in-ohio-courts/
Accessed: Nov. 3, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does LexisNexis's User consents to personal jurisdiction in Ohio courts clause do?

The clause states: “The Terms of Use are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio and any action arising out of or relating to these terms shall be filed only in state or federal courts located in Montgomery County, Ohio, and by using this Web Site …”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 263 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with LexisNexis?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LexisNexis.