Gusto can change these terms at any time. If you keep using Gusto after a change takes effect, you automatically agree to the new terms.
This analysis describes what Gusto's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual terms governing the service relationship may be altered without requiring affirmative consent from users. It establishes notice and continued-use-as-acceptance as the operational procedures for term modifications.
The updated terms make explicit that requesting a background check through Gusto creates a legally binding agreement not just with Gusto but also incorporating terms from Gusto's payroll service and Checkr's service agreement. This means customers are committing to multiple overlapping sets of terms when they initiate a background check request. The change does not appear to alter the substantive rights or obligations, but rather clarifies their scope and binding nature in writing.
View change record →Developers integrating with Gusto's platform are now bound by mandatory arbitration and class action waiver provisions, meaning they cannot join or file class actions against Gusto and must resolve disputes through individual, binding arbitration. The updated terms also grant Gusto the right to modify, update, or discontinue developer tools at its sole discretion without notice or liability, which could disrupt integrations and require developers to absorb costs of upgrading to new versions. Developers should review Section 19 of the updated terms carefully before creating or maintaining integrations with Gusto's platform, and consider whether the arbitration and modification provisions align with their business and legal risk tolerance.
View change record →The updated terms now explicitly state that Employers waive the right to participate in class-action lawsuits and must pursue all claims against Gusto on an individual basis through binding arbitration. This means Employers can no longer join other users in collective legal action, even if many face identical problems with Gusto's service or billing. Individual arbitration typically costs more and produces less leverage for individual plaintiffs than class actions. You should review whether this dispute resolution requirement aligns with your business needs and consult legal counsel if you have concerns about waiving class-action rights.
View change record →Employer-customers who do not actively monitor Gusto's terms updates may find themselves bound by new provisions, including changes to the arbitration clause, liability limits, or data use policies, simply by continuing to run payroll on the platform.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Modification of Terms and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Gusto has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Gusto reserves the right to modify these Terms at any time. We will provide notice of material changes by posting the updated Terms on our website or by sending you an email. Your continued use of the Services after the effective date of any such changes constitutes your acceptance of the new Terms.— Excerpt from Gusto's Gusto Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Clickwrap and browsewrap contract modification through continued use is broadly enforceable in US commercial contexts under the doctrine of assent by conduct. However, courts increasingly require that notice of material changes be adequate and conspicuous. The FTC has issued guidance on deceptive contract modification practices that may apply if notice is insufficient or changes materially alter previously disclosed terms. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The modification provision is standard but creates ongoing contract management obligations for employer-customers. Changes to the arbitration clause, liability cap, or data processing terms post-acceptance are particularly significant and should trigger a review cycle. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts have scrutinized browsewrap-style contract modifications more carefully than some other jurisdictions. If a material change is made without adequate notice, a California court might decline to enforce the modified provision against a customer who did not have adequate opportunity to review the change. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise vendor management teams should subscribe to Gusto's terms update notifications and establish a review workflow triggered by any notification of material changes. Contract management systems should include Gusto in the list of vendors subject to periodic terms review. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should establish a process for reviewing Gusto terms updates promptly upon notification. If a material change is unacceptable, the customer's remedy is typically to terminate the agreement before the new terms take effect, which requires awareness of the update timing and the termination process.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual terms governing the service relationship may be altered without requiring affirmative consent from users. It establishes notice and continued-use-as-acceptance as the operational procedures for term modifications.
Employer-customers who do not actively monitor Gusto's terms updates may find themselves bound by new provisions, including changes to the arbitration clause, liability limits, or data use policies, simply by continuing to run payroll on the platform.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 14 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Gusto.