This analysis describes what Grindr's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This waiver eliminates the ability for users to join together to pursue collective legal action against Grindr, which can significantly reduce the practical ability to challenge Grindr's conduct.
Interpretive note: The excerpt is truncated after 'WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO HAVE ANY DISPUTE BE BROUGHT...' and may contain additional qualifying language. The canonical claim reflects only what is explicitly stated.
You are prohibited from bringing or joining a class, representative, or collective claim against Grindr and waive all rights to do so.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
Monitoring
Grindr has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"EACH OF US MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS, REPRESENTATIVE, OR COLLECTIVE BASIS, AND THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO HAVE ANY DISPUTE BE BROUGHT...— Excerpt from Grindr's Grindr Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This waiver eliminates the ability for users to join together to pursue collective legal action against Grindr, which can significantly reduce the practical ability to challenge Grindr's conduct.
You are prohibited from bringing or joining a class, representative, or collective claim against Grindr and waive all rights to do so.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 204 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grindr.