Provision record
Google Gemini · Gemini 3.1 Pro Model Card · View original document ↗

Manual Review of Flagged Safety Evaluation Losses

Common · 138 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Google Gemini and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Google Gemini's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Kling AI

To ensure the safety, security and stability of Kling AI, we may scan, analyze, and review User Content to detect and combat harmful activity and content, frauds, illegal activity or content on this Platform.

Dun & Bradstreet

Dun & Bradstreet retains the right, which it may or may not exercise in its sole discretion, to review, edit or delete any material that Dun & Bradstreet deems to be illegal, offensive or otherwise inappropriate.

NotebookLM

The Services include safety features to block harmful content, such as content that violates our Prohibited Use Policy.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We expect variation in our automated safety evaluations results, which is why we review flagged content to check for egregious or dangerous material.

Excerpt from Google Gemini's Gemini 3.1 Pro Model Card

Provision details

Document information
Document
Gemini 3.1 Pro Model Card
Entity
Google Gemini
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 6, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006350, captured Sept. 3, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-068374
Document ID
CA-D-000925
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006350; extractor version not recorded, may not reproduce today)
628557684d0b131e32bf5f36405a664de81cb45b04bcec0febfaea58ea422c1b
Analysis generated
July 6, 2026 22:12 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006350, captured Sept. 3, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007520, captured Oct. 14, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Google Gemini
Document: Gemini 3.1 Pro Model Card
Record ID: CA-P-068374
Version: CA-V-006350
Captured: 2026-09-03 00:54:20 UTC
SHA-256: 628557684d0b131e…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/google-gemini/gemini-31-pro-model-card/provision/CA-P-068374/manual-review-of-flagged-safety-evaluation-losses/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Google Gemini's Manual Review of Flagged Safety Evaluation Losses clause do?

The clause states: “We expect variation in our automated safety evaluations results, which is why we review flagged content to check for egregious or dangerous material.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 138 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Google Gemini?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google Gemini.