Provision record
GOAT · GOAT Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in Central District of California

Common · 264 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track GOAT and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what GOAT's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any action to prevent the actual or threatened infringement...will be the state and federal courts located in the Central District of California, and each of you and GOAT waives any objection to jurisdiction and venue in such courts.

Excerpt from GOAT's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
GOAT Terms of Use
Entity
GOAT
Date stated by the document
Jan. 26, 2026
As printed in GOAT’s text (version CA-V-007636), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-001360, captured May 5, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-062854
Document ID
CA-D-000735
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-001360)
ca08b258f13f03f1dfef7ff1e247b6b5668f0dabf55cbda092024aad25eff10a
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 23:47 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-001360, captured May 5, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007636, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: GOAT
Document: GOAT Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-062854
Version: CA-V-001360
Captured: 2026-05-05 06:44:05 UTC
SHA-256: ca08b258f13f03f1…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/goat/goat-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-062854/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-central-district-of-california/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does GOAT's Exclusive Jurisdiction in Central District of California clause do?

The clause states: “The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any action to prevent the actual or threatened infringement...will be the state and federal courts located in the Central District of California, and each of you and GOAT waives any objection to jurisdiction and venue in such courts.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with GOAT?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GOAT.