Provision record
GOAT · GOAT Terms of Use · View original document ↗

EU UK Swiss Personal Data Disputes Referred to JAMS

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track GOAT and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what GOAT's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The arbitrator will have exclusive authority to resolve any Dispute, except the state or federal courts of San Francisco, California have the authority to determine any Dispute about enforceability...

Anyscale

If you use the Anyscale Services on behalf of a business or organization, You and Anyscale agree to resolve any dispute, claim, or controversy...pursuant to Section 10.5.

Postman

The services of JAMS are provided at no cost to you.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
we commit to refer any unresolved complaints about our collection and handling of personal data received in reliance on the EU-U.S. DPF...to Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc...

Excerpt from GOAT's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
GOAT Terms of Use
Entity
GOAT
Date stated by the document
Jan. 26, 2026
As printed in GOAT’s text (version CA-V-007636), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-001360, captured May 5, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-063093
Document ID
CA-D-000735
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-001360)
ca08b258f13f03f1dfef7ff1e247b6b5668f0dabf55cbda092024aad25eff10a
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 23:47 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-001360, captured May 5, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007636, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: GOAT
Document: GOAT Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-063093
Version: CA-V-001360
Captured: 2026-05-05 06:44:05 UTC
SHA-256: ca08b258f13f03f1…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/goat/goat-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-063093/eu-uk-swiss-personal-data-disputes-referred-to-jams/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does GOAT's EU UK Swiss Personal Data Disputes Referred to JAMS clause do?

The clause states: “we commit to refer any unresolved complaints about our collection and handling of personal data received in reliance on the EU-U.S. DPF...to Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with GOAT?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GOAT.