This analysis describes what FanDuel's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause is consequential because it eliminates access to court for all covered disputes, binding users to arbitration as the sole resolution mechanism.
The reader cannot bring covered claims, disputes, or disagreements related to the Agreement in court; they must use binding arbitration exclusively.
How other platforms handle this
except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
all Disputes arising out of or relating to the Class Action Waiver, including any claim that all or part of the Class Action Waiver is unenforceable...shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction and not by an arbitrator...
Monitoring
FanDuel has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"all claims, disputes, or disagreements arising out of or relating in any way to the interpretation or performance of the Agreement...shall be resolved exclusively through binding arbitration— Excerpt from FanDuel's FanDuel Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause is consequential because it eliminates access to court for all covered disputes, binding users to arbitration as the sole resolution mechanism.
The reader cannot bring covered claims, disputes, or disagreements related to the Agreement in court; they must use binding arbitration exclusively.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FanDuel.