“THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION TO RESOLVE INDIVIDUAL DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU SHOULD THERE BE A DISPUTE.”
This analysis describes what Faire's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users are notified at acceptance that both their forum for resolving disputes and the remedies they may pursue are contractually restricted.
Interpretive note: The canonical claim states two independent propositions (arbitration requirement and remedy limitation). The arbitration requirement is the primary one; the remedy limitation is recorded here.
Users cannot bring jury trials or class actions against Faire and are limited to the remedies permitted under the arbitration framework.
How other platforms handle this
This section does not require informal dispute resolution or arbitration of the following claims: (i) individual claims brought in small claims court...
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION TO RESOLVE INDIVIDUAL DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU SHOULD THERE BE A DISPUTE.Excerpt from Faire's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Users are notified at acceptance that both their forum for resolving disputes and the remedies they may pursue are contractually restricted.
Users cannot bring jury trials or class actions against Faire and are limited to the remedies permitted under the arbitration framework.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Faire.