Faire · Faire Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Arbitration Requirement Disclosed At Acceptance

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 204 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Faire Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Faire's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users are notified at acceptance that both their forum for resolving disputes and the remedies they may pursue are contractually restricted.

Interpretive note: The canonical claim states two independent propositions (arbitration requirement and remedy limitation). The arbitration requirement is the primary one; the remedy limitation is recorded here.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Users cannot bring jury trials or class actions against Faire and are limited to the remedies permitted under the arbitration framework.

How other platforms handle this

Wise Medium

Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...

Chegg Medium

in the event that there are 100 or more individual Requests of a similar nature filed against Chegg by or with the assistance of the same law firm...within a 30 day period...the AAA (1) will administer the arbitration demands in batches of 100 Requests per batch...

Microsoft Copilot Medium

except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Faire has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION TO RESOLVE INDIVIDUAL DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU SHOULD THERE BE A DISPUTE.

— Excerpt from Faire's Faire Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Faire Terms of Service
Entity
Faire
Document last updated
July 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 6, 2026
Last verified
July 6, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-068221
Document ID
CA-D-00915
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c5892984e6fed39ec505398329c40e52589056aa1798302443dd209462b4ff7c
Analysis generated
July 6, 2026 15:31 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Faire
Document: Faire Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-068221
Captured: 2026-07-06 15:31:41 UTC
SHA-256: c5892984e6fed39e…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/faire/faire-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-068221/arbitration-requirement-disclosed-at-acceptance/
Accessed: July 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Faire's Arbitration Requirement Disclosed At Acceptance clause do?

Users are notified at acceptance that both their forum for resolving disputes and the remedies they may pursue are contractually restricted.

How does this clause affect you?

Users cannot bring jury trials or class actions against Faire and are limited to the remedies permitted under the arbitration framework.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 204 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Faire?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Faire.