Provision record
Disney+ · Disney+ Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Offer of Judgment Cost-Shifting in Arbitration

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Disney+ and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Disney+'s agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Booking.com

If the offer made by one party is not accepted by the other party, and the other party fails to obtain a more favorable award, the other party shall not recover any post-offer costs to which they otherwise would be entitled

OpenAI

If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.

Credit Karma

you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If an offer made by one party is not accepted by the other party, and the other party fails to obtain a more favorable award, the other party shall not recover their post-offer costs and shall pay the offering party's costs...

Excerpt from Disney+'s Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Disney+ Terms of Use
Entity
Disney+
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 16, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-001913, captured April 22, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-022625
Document ID
CA-D-000083
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-001913)
7cb0032d2c24b69e309b708c908fc43e636f3a25fc76f002f859d13180a33a94
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 05:33 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-001913, captured April 22, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Disney+
Document: Disney+ Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-022625
Version: CA-V-001913
Captured: 2026-04-22 06:03:54 UTC
SHA-256: 7cb0032d2c24b69e…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/disney/disney-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-022625/offer-of-judgment-cost-shifting-in-arbitration/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Disney+'s Offer of Judgment Cost-Shifting in Arbitration clause do?

The clause states: “If an offer made by one party is not accepted by the other party, and the other party fails to obtain a more favorable award, the other party shall not recover their post-offer costs and shall pay the offering party's costs...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Disney+?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Disney+.