This provision prohibits users from participating in class action, collective, or representative legal actions against Discord, whether in arbitration or in court proceedings where arbitration does not apply.
This analysis describes what Discord's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause requires that all disputes be pursued individually, which applies both within arbitration and in any court proceedings where the arbitration clause does not govern. The provision has separate application from the arbitration clause itself, extending the individual-only requirement to non-arbitrable claims.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of the class action waiver in non-arbitral court proceedings varies by jurisdiction and has not been uniformly resolved across all U.S. states.
Under this clause, users who have disputes with Discord arising from shared or systemic issues must pursue those claims individually rather than as part of a collective or class proceeding. The agreement states this applies to any dispute not otherwise subject to arbitration, covering a broad range of potential claim types.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Class Action Waiver and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"You agree that any Dispute between you and Discord that for any reason is not subject to the "Agreement to Arbitrate" section below may only be pursued by you on an individual basis, and you may not bring a claim as a plaintiff or a class member in a class, collective, or representative action.Excerpt from Discord's Terms of Service
1.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This clause requires that all disputes be pursued individually, which applies both within arbitration and in any court proceedings where the arbitration clause does not govern. The provision has separate application from the arbitration clause itself, extending the individual-only requirement to non-arbitrable claims.
Under this clause, users who have disputes with Discord arising from shared or systemic issues must pursue those claims individually rather than as part of a collective or class proceeding. The agreement states this applies to any dispute not otherwise subject to arbitration, covering a broad range of potential claim types.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Discord.