DeepSeek · DeepSeek Model License · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Policy and Prohibited Conduct

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 4 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity DeepSeek recorded 12 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for DeepSeek Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Users are required to comply with all applicable laws when using the model and are prohibited from generating harmful or deceptive content with it.

This analysis describes what DeepSeek's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision places affirmative compliance obligations on the deploying organization rather than on DeepSeek, meaning that legal responsibility for lawful and non-harmful use of the model's outputs rests with the user or deploying entity.

Interpretive note: The terms 'harmful' and 'deceptive' are not defined in the license, and the applicable legal standards vary significantly by jurisdiction and deployment context, creating interpretive uncertainty for deploying organizations.

Change history

modified Jun 25, 2026

Severity upgraded from medium to high, indicating increased importance of compliance enforcement.

View full change record →
modified Jun 21, 2026

Severity was increased from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement expectations for acceptable use compliance.

View full change record →
modified Jun 18, 2026

Severity was increased from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek prioritized enforcement of acceptable use policies.

View full change record →
modified Jun 16, 2026

Severity was elevated from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek increased enforcement priority for acceptable use compliance.

View full change record →
modified Jun 11, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement of acceptable use requirements.

View full change record →
modified Jun 8, 2026

Severity was upgraded from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek elevated the importance of acceptable use compliance requirements.

View full change record →
modified Jun 2, 2026

Severity was elevated from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement of acceptable use policies.

View full change record →
modified Jun 2, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement priority.

View full change record →
modified May 27, 2026

Severity was increased from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek elevated the importance of acceptable use compliance.

View full change record →
modified May 26, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek elevated enforcement priority for acceptable use compliance.

View full change record →
modified May 25, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement priority.

View full change record →
modified May 16, 2026

Severity was elevated from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement priority.

View full change record →
modified May 15, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek elevated the importance of acceptable use compliance.

View full change record →
modified May 14, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating DeepSeek prioritized compliance enforcement.

View full change record →
modified May 14, 2026

Severity increased from medium to high, indicating stricter enforcement priority for compliance requirements.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Organizations and developers deploying DeepSeek-R1 in products bear the contractual and legal responsibility for ensuring that the model's outputs comply with applicable laws and do not generate harmful or deceptive content; this obligation is not assumed by DeepSeek under the license.

How other platforms handle this

Replit Medium

You agree not to use the Services to: (a) violate any applicable law or regulation; (b) infringe the intellectual property rights of others; (c) transmit any material that is harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, or otherwise objectionable; (d) distribute malware or ...

Cohere Medium

Customer agrees to comply with Cohere's Acceptable Use Policy, as updated from time to time, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Customer may not use the Services for any unlawful purpose, to generate content that infringes third-party rights, or in any manner that violates appli...

Cloudflare Medium

You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated 'scraping'; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation 'robots,' 's...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

DeepSeek has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You must comply with applicable laws and regulations in your use of the Model. You will not use the Model to generate content that is harmful, deceptive, or otherwise violates applicable laws.

— Excerpt from DeepSeek's DeepSeek Model License

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision interacts with a broad range of regulatory frameworks depending on the deployment context, including the EU AI Act (which imposes obligations on deployers of AI systems, particularly high-risk systems), FTC regulations on deceptive practices, GDPR where model outputs involve personal data, and sector-specific regulations in healthcare, financial services, and education. The provision does not define 'harmful' or 'deceptive,' leaving the compliance burden on the deploying organization to interpret these terms in light of applicable law. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for organizations deploying the model in consumer-facing or regulated industry contexts. The broad and undefined nature of 'harmful' and 'deceptive' content means that compliance teams must develop their own content governance frameworks for DeepSeek-R1 outputs, without specific guidance from DeepSeek. This is particularly significant under the EU AI Act, which imposes mandatory risk assessments for certain AI applications. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU deployers face the most immediate regulatory exposure given the EU AI Act's requirements for high-risk AI systems, which include obligations for transparency, human oversight, and risk management that the license itself does not address. U.S. deployers in regulated sectors (financial services under FINRA/SEC guidance, healthcare under HHS/OCR, education under FERPA) must ensure that model outputs comply with sector-specific content and privacy obligations. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations using DeepSeek-R1 in B2B contexts should ensure that downstream customer contracts include appropriate acceptable use provisions and that the compliance obligations imposed by this license clause are flowed down to customers who further deploy the model's outputs. Indemnification provisions in customer contracts should address the allocation of liability for harmful or unlawful model outputs. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Deploying organizations should implement content filtering, output monitoring, and human review processes appropriate to their use case and the regulatory environment in which they operate. Legal teams should conduct a regulatory mapping exercise to identify all applicable laws and regulations that the 'comply with applicable laws' requirement implicates for their specific deployment context.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over deceptive practices in commerce, which is directly relevant to the license's prohibition on generating deceptive content using the model.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA

Provision details

Document information
Document
DeepSeek Model License
Entity
DeepSeek
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012032
Document ID
CA-D-00835
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
3820019a2e68c5f34d0af8aec3dcb5aae33eb32b590b6e699144434fa68b28e4
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 17:13 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: DeepSeek
Document: DeepSeek Model License
Record ID: CA-P-012032
Captured: 2026-05-12 17:13:17 UTC
SHA-256: 3820019a2e68c5f3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/deepseek/deepseek-model-license/acceptable-use-policy-and-prohibited-conduct/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does DeepSeek's Acceptable Use Policy and Prohibited Conduct clause do?

This provision places affirmative compliance obligations on the deploying organization rather than on DeepSeek, meaning that legal responsibility for lawful and non-harmful use of the model's outputs rests with the user or deploying entity.

How does this clause affect you?

Organizations and developers deploying DeepSeek-R1 in products bear the contractual and legal responsibility for ensuring that the model's outputs comply with applicable laws and do not generate harmful or deceptive content; this obligation is not assumed by DeepSeek under the license.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 4 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with DeepSeek?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DeepSeek.