This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Exclusive jurisdiction in San Francisco means users cannot litigate in their local courts and must appear or be represented in a specific geographic forum.
If you have a dispute with Databricks, you are required to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of courts in San Francisco, California.
How other platforms handle this
the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...
"each party shall submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in San Francisco, California.Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Exclusive jurisdiction in San Francisco means users cannot litigate in their local courts and must appear or be represented in a specific geographic forum.
If you have a dispute with Databricks, you are required to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of courts in San Francisco, California.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.