This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Some of our evaluations lacked some basic elicitation techniques such as best-of-N or chain-of-thought prompting...We are now systematically tracking these gaps to avoid future under-elicitation.
We will endeavor to ensure that, by default, we only collect and process your Data needed to provide you access to the Platform and our Services...This means that we will neither publish nor share your Data by default.
We use industry standard technical and organizational measures to secure the information we store.
"Databricks follows RFC 9116, ISO/IEC 30111:2019(E), and ISO/IEC 29147:2018(E) standards for security vulnerability handling and communications.Excerpt from Databricks's Security Practices
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Databricks follows RFC 9116, ISO/IEC 30111:2019(E), and ISO/IEC 29147:2018(E) standards for security vulnerability handling and communications.”
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.