Cursor · Cursor Security Practices · View original document ↗

Vulnerability Disclosure and Incident Communication

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Cursor recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Cursor Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Cursor accepts vulnerability reports by email and acknowledges them within 5 business days; critical security incidents are communicated by email to affected users.

This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The document states that critical incidents will be communicated to affected users by email, which is the mechanism users should expect to receive breach or incident notifications; users should ensure their email address on file is current.

Interpretive note: The document does not define 'critical incident' thresholds, specify notification timelines for affected users beyond the 5-business-day acknowledgment for reports, or clarify whether this commitment satisfies GDPR Article 33-34 or state breach notification law requirements.

Change history

modified Jun 10, 2026

No textual changes detected; provision content remains identical.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision states that affected users will receive email notification of critical security incidents; users should keep their Cursor account email address current to ensure they receive any such notifications.

How other platforms handle this

BeReal Medium

In the event of a merger, acquisition, reorganization, bankruptcy, or other similar event, your personal data may be transferred to a successor entity or third party as part of that transaction.

Tinder Medium

We may disclose your information if we believe that disclosure is in accordance with, or required by, any applicable law or legal process, including lawful requests by public authorities to meet national security or law enforcement requirements. We may also disclose your information if we believe it...

Ledger Medium

At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Cursor has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If you believe you have found a vulnerability in Cursor, please submit a report to security-reports@cursor.com. We acknowledge vulnerability reports within 5 business days and address them as soon as we are able. Critical incidents are communicated via email to affected users.

— Excerpt from Cursor's Cursor Security Practices

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Article 33 requires notification to supervisory authorities within 72 hours of a personal data breach; Article 34 requires notification to affected data subjects without undue delay for high-risk breaches. The document's 'critical incidents' email commitment is relevant to but does not fully specify compliance with these obligations. U.S. state breach notification laws (including California's Civil Code Section 1798.82) impose similar notification requirements. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The document commits to email notification for 'critical incidents' but does not define criticality thresholds, notification timelines beyond acknowledgment, or the scope of affected users. This ambiguity may create gaps relative to GDPR Article 33-34 and state breach notification law requirements. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA customers face heightened exposure given GDPR's 72-hour supervisory authority notification requirement. California, New York, and other states with specific breach notification timelines also create jurisdiction-specific exposure. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise DPAs should specify incident notification timelines, the definition of 'critical incident,' and the escalation process. The 5-business-day acknowledgment of vulnerability reports is relevant for vendor security SLAs. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the 'critical incidents' email commitment satisfies applicable breach notification law requirements in relevant jurisdictions and whether additional contractual provisions are needed to specify notification timelines and scope.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over data breach notification practices and security representations made to consumers.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general enforce state breach notification laws that may require more specific notification timelines than those described in this document.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Cursor Security Practices
Entity
Cursor
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012008
Document ID
CA-D-00832
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
f81380b0de4994eb495b7cf2f92f334ba864a29a36516ad999427f2b5dc9f239
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 17:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Cursor
Document: Cursor Security Practices
Record ID: CA-P-012008
Captured: 2026-05-12 17:00:33 UTC
SHA-256: f81380b0de4994eb…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/cursor/cursor-security-practices/vulnerability-disclosure-and-incident-communication/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cursor's Vulnerability Disclosure and Incident Communication clause do?

The document states that critical incidents will be communicated to affected users by email, which is the mechanism users should expect to receive breach or incident notifications; users should ensure their email address on file is current.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision states that affected users will receive email notification of critical security incidents; users should keep their Cursor account email address current to ensure they receive any such notifications.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Cursor?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.