“Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.”
This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
How other platforms handle this
To the extent that any provisions in the Business Terms of Service conflict with these Terms, the Business Terms of Service shall govern to the extent of the conflict.
Regardless of who terminates these Terms, both you and Snap continue to be bound by Sections 2, 3 (to the extent any additional terms and conditions would, by their terms, survive), and 6 - 25 of the Terms.
You agree that SoFi may contact you about any matter relating to your activity with, any inquiry submitted to, or any account or product you have with SoFi.
"Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.Excerpt from Cursor's Security Practices
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 298 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.