This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
How other platforms handle this
If you believe we have taken action against your content or account in a way that does not comply with these Terms, you have the right to bring a claim for breach of contract under UK law.
These Terms and the licenses granted hereunder may be assigned by the Company but may not be assigned by you without the prior express written consent of the Company.
"Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.Excerpt from Cursor's Security Practices
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 297 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.