This analysis describes what Binance.US's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users cannot pursue disputes against Binance.US in court; they are contractually bound to individual arbitration for all claims relating to the Terms or Services.
The updated terms introduce automatic enrollment in Soft-Staking for eligible tokens held in user accounts, meaning assets will be staked on Binance.US's behalf with third-party providers unless users opt out before the policy takes effect. Previously, the terms stated staking was optional and required explicit designation. The revised language also establishes that starting July 1, 2026, users will receive at least 14 days' notice before material changes to fee schedules, terms, or account policies take effect. Users can avoid automatic staking by opting out before July 1, 2026, or by withdrawing or designating specific tokens as ineligible for Soft-Staking.
View change record →If you have a dispute with Binance.US relating to the Terms or Services, you are required to resolve it through binding arbitration on an individual basis, not through the court system.
How other platforms handle this
except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
Monitoring
Binance.US has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Services...shall be resolved through binding arbitration on an individual basis— Excerpt from Binance.US's Binance.US Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Users cannot pursue disputes against Binance.US in court; they are contractually bound to individual arbitration for all claims relating to the Terms or Services.
If you have a dispute with Binance.US relating to the Terms or Services, you are required to resolve it through binding arbitration on an individual basis, not through the court system.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 199 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Binance.US.