Anthropic · Anthropic Sub-Processors · View original document ↗

Core Cloud Infrastructure Subprocessors

Low severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Anthropic changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Anthropic recorded 3 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Get same-day alerts →
Monitor governance changes for Anthropic Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The document identifies Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure as cloud infrastructure subprocessors for all Anthropic products worldwide. All three are designated as operating worldwide.

This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The use of three major cloud infrastructure providers across all products means that data processed through any Claude product, including user inputs and model outputs, is hosted within the infrastructure of one or more of these providers. Enterprise customers should verify that their DPAs with Anthropic address how workloads are distributed across these three providers and confirm that applicable data residency requirements, if any, are satisfied.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under these provisions, data processed through any Claude product is hosted on cloud infrastructure operated by Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure, all of which operate globally. The document does not specify how data is distributed across these three providers or whether users can request or configure data residency preferences.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Core Cloud Infrastructure Subprocessors and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Anthropic has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Google Cloud Platform • Cloud infrastructure Worldwide Products: All Products Amazon Web Services • Cloud Infrastructure Worldwide Products: All Products Microsoft Azure • Cloud Infrastructure Worldwide Products: All Products

Excerpt from Anthropic's Sub-Processors

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Multi-cloud infrastructure arrangements across all three providers engage GDPR Article 28 subprocessor chain requirements, data residency obligations under various national and sector-specific laws, and Schrems II considerations for transatlantic data flows. Each of Google Cloud, AWS, and Microsoft Azure maintains its own FedRAMP authorizations and GDPR compliance frameworks, though Anthropic's downstream use of these platforms requires its own documented transfer and processing agreements. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The combination of three global cloud providers without specification of data distribution or residency configuration creates uncertainty for organizations with data localization requirements. Healthcare, financial services, and public sector customers in particular may have contractual or regulatory requirements specifying permissible cloud providers or geographic regions. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA organizations subject to GDPR data residency or transfer restrictions should confirm the specific regions and data centers used for their workloads. Sector-specific regulations in financial services (e.g., EBA guidelines on cloud outsourcing) and healthcare (HIPAA) may impose additional requirements on the use of public cloud infrastructure for sensitive data. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise DPAs with Anthropic should specify which cloud providers are authorized for which data categories and whether data residency configurations are available. The listing of all three providers for all products does not indicate whether all three are simultaneously used or whether Anthropic uses different providers for different regions or workloads. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should confirm that Anthropic's DPA or order form specifies the geographic regions in which data is processed, assess whether their organization's data classification policies permit processing on all three listed cloud platforms, and verify that Anthropic's sub-DPAs with these providers are reflected in any data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) the organization has conducted.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Provision details

Document information
Document
Anthropic Sub-Processors
Entity
Anthropic
Document last updated
July 6, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016518
Document ID
CA-D-00927
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
457bdbd014a4e53dbff83f8c81ac0d19955ab074b3b80141c282daaa071fb66a
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:51 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Anthropic
Document: Anthropic Sub-Processors
Record ID: CA-P-016518
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:51:04 UTC
SHA-256: 457bdbd014a4e53d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/anthropic/anthropic-sub-processors/provision/CA-P-016518/core-cloud-infrastructure-subprocessors/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Anthropic's Core Cloud Infrastructure Subprocessors clause do?

The use of three major cloud infrastructure providers across all products means that data processed through any Claude product, including user inputs and model outputs, is hosted within the infrastructure of one or more of these providers. Enterprise customers should verify that their DPAs with Anthropic address how workloads are distributed across these three providers and confirm that applicable data …

How does this clause affect you?

Under these provisions, data processed through any Claude product is hosted on cloud infrastructure operated by Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure, all of which operate globally. The document does not specify how data is distributed across these three providers or whether users can request or configure data residency preferences.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Anthropic?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.