This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This exception creates a carve-out from the opt-out mechanism that allows the entity to retain training rights over flagged or reported content regardless of a user's training opt-out election. The provision operationalizes safety review and user-initiated reporting as independent grounds for data use authorization.
Users who opt out of training data usage remain subject to training use of their conversations if those conversations are flagged for safety review or if the user reports content through Anthropic's feedback mechanisms. The scope of the opt-out is therefore conditional rather than absolute.
How other platforms handle this
We use information to enhance the quality, reliability, and/or accuracy of our AI Features by creating, developing, training, testing, improving, and maintaining AI and ML models run by Strava or our service providers. We use aggregated, de-identified data for this purpose. We also use personal info...
If you are a California resident, you have the right to: Know what personal information is being collected about you; Know whether your personal information is sold or disclosed and to whom; Say no to the sale of personal information; Access your personal information; Request deletion of your person...
Depending on where you live, you may have certain rights with respect to your personal information, such as the right to request access, correction, or deletion of your personal information, or to opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information. If you are a California resident, you have...
Monitoring
Anthropic has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Even if you opt-out, we will use Inputs and Outputs for model improvement when: (1) your conversations are flagged for safety review to improve our ability to detect harmful content, enforce our policies, or advance AI safety research, or (2) you've explicitly reported the materials to us (for example via our feedback mechanisms).— Excerpt from Anthropic's Anthropic Privacy Policy
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This exception creates a carve-out from the opt-out mechanism that allows the entity to retain training rights over flagged or reported content regardless of a user's training opt-out election. The provision operationalizes safety review and user-initiated reporting as independent grounds for data use authorization.
Users who opt out of training data usage remain subject to training use of their conversations if those conversations are flagged for safety review or if the user reports content through Anthropic's feedback mechanisms. The scope of the opt-out is therefore conditional rather than absolute.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.