This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The opt-out for model training is not absolute; two specific conditions—safety flagging and user-initiated reporting—override the opt-out, meaning users cannot prevent training use of flagged or self-reported content.
An opted-out user's Inputs and Outputs will still be used for model improvement if those conversations are flagged for safety review or if the user explicitly reported the materials to Anthropic.
How other platforms handle this
Where the law allows us to, we may use the content you and other users have posted for training or to help us to improve the way we filter content on our platform.
In accordance with applicable legal requirements, we may use your information to tailor and provide you with content and advertisements.
We may use your personal data to personalize your experience interacting with Content, including what Content we recommend, show, or don't show to you.
"Even if you opt-out, we will use Inputs and Outputs for model improvement when: (i) your conversations are flagged for safety review...or (ii) you've explicitly reported the materials to usExcerpt from Anthropic's Privacy Policy (Superseded Capture)
We read the privacy policies and terms of service of 38 AI platforms. Here is what they say about training, retention, arbitration, and liability.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The opt-out for model training is not absolute; two specific conditions—safety flagging and user-initiated reporting—override the opt-out, meaning users cannot prevent training use of flagged or self-reported content.
An opted-out user's Inputs and Outputs will still be used for model improvement if those conversations are flagged for safety review or if the user explicitly reported the materials to Anthropic.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 279 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.