Target added a new fee disclosure to their Terms and Conditions on April 30, 2026. The updated terms now explicitly state that a 'CA Shipt Shopper Benefit Fee' is charged on all Same Day Deliveries in California. Previously, this fee was not mentioned in the terms, so California customers may not have been clearly informed about this additional charge.
California customers who use Target's Same Day Delivery service will now be charged an additional fee called the 'CA Shipt Shopper Benefit Fee.' This fee applies to all Same Day Deliveries in California and was not previously disclosed in Target's Terms and Conditions. You can review your order summary at checkout to see the full breakdown of fees before completing a Same Day Delivery purchase.
If you live in California and use Target's Same Day Delivery, you will be charged an extra fee called the CA Shipt Shopper Benefit Fee.
California Target customers using Same Day Delivery now have a new fee applied to their orders, which was not previously disclosed in the Terms and Conditions. This matters because undisclosed or inadequately disclosed fees may violate California's Honest Pricing Law and FTC guidelines.
ConductAtlas has recorded 3 material changes to this document over 38 days of monitoring (since March 2026). An additional minor or cosmetic changes were excluded.
2 of Target's significant changes have been classified as negative for consumers.
A new fee is now formally disclosed in the Terms and Conditions, applying to all Same Day Deliveries placed in California.
ConductAtlas Policy Archive Entity: Target | Document: Target Terms and Conditions | Record: CA-C-000731 Captured: 2026-04-30 06:25:46 UTC URL: https://conductatlas.com/change/2026-04-30-target-target-terms-and-conditions-731/ Accessed: May 2, 2026
Unlock the full analysis
14-day free trial available.
Target has added a new California-specific fee disclosure to its Terms and Conditions effective April 30, 2026, requiring that a 'CA Shipt Shopper Benefit Fee' be charged on all Same Day Deliveries in California. This touches California consumer protection law, specifically fee transparency requirements under the California Automatic Renewal Law and broader CCPA/consumer disclosure obligations. Compliance teams should confirm this fee was already being collected (making this a retroactive disclosure) or whether it is newly imposed, as the distinction affects potential exposure under California consumer protection statutes. Action is required to assess whether existing customer-facing disclosures and checkout flows adequately surface this fee prior to purchase.
1. California Automatic Renewal Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17600 et seq.) — requires clear and conspicuous disclosure of fees before consumers are charged; this new fee must be prominently disclosed at checkout.
Compliance intelligence locked
Obligation analysis, escalation trigger, board language, and recommended action.
Watcher: regulatory citations + obligations. Professional: full compliance memo.
ConductAtlas provides verified policy intelligence sourced directly from platform documents. All analysis is intended to support, not replace, legal and compliance review. Record CA-C-000731.
This new provision grants Target unilateral amendment authority with acceptance via continued use, eliminating user ability to affirmatively consent or reject significant terms changes.
This addition incorporates the Privacy Policy by reference, making it enforceable as part of the Terms and Conditions without requiring separate user acknowledgment.
Removal of explicit CCPA opt-out provision is significant as it eliminates user ability to exercise California privacy rights and control sale/sharing of personal information under the terms.
Removal of indemnification clause eliminates user obligation to defend and hold harmless Target, reducing user liability exposure for claims against the company.
Previous version had no excerpt content; current version now includes detailed arbitration clause with specific carve-outs for small claims court and injunctive relief.
Renamed from 'Perpetual IP License on User-Submitted Content' to 'User-Generated Content License' with explicit excerpt now provided detailing the scope of Target's sublicensable rights.
Previous version had no excerpt; current version now specifies exclusive jurisdiction and venue in Hennepin County, Minnesota state and federal courts, not just Minnesota governing law.
Renamed from 'Limitation of Liability Cap' to 'Limitation of Liability' with full explicit excerpt now provided detailing the scope of damages exclusions.
Renamed from 'Account Termination and Suspension' to 'Account Termination' with excerpt now specifying Target's discretionary rights to refuse service, edit content, and cancel orders.
1 provision unchanged.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle similar provisions across the ConductAtlas archive.
See the full side-by-side comparison of every sentence added, removed, and modified.
🔒 Unlock full diff — Watcher $9.99/moTarget updated its Terms and Conditions on April 16, 2026, removing four sentences that explained how online orders containing Target …
We monitor 200+ platforms and archive every change — verified and timestamped.