If Tabnine gets sued or incurs costs because of something you did with their service — including using AI-generated code that infringes someone's copyright — you are responsible for paying their legal bills.
You could be personally responsible for Tabnine's legal costs if you inadvertently use their AI-generated code in a way that infringes a third party's copyright or privacy rights — a real risk given ongoing uncertainty about AI-generated code and copyright law.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Indemnification by User and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →This clause creates a one-sided financial obligation: while Tabnine's liability to you is capped at $100, your potential liability to Tabnine is unlimited, including covering their attorney fees in disputes.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Broad indemnification clauses in consumer contracts are subject to unconscionability challenges under UCC § 2-302 and common law contract principles. In the EU, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (93/13/EEC) may render such one-sided indemnification obligations unenforceable against consumers. The particular risk of indemnification for third-party copyright claims arising from AI-generated code engages copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.) and the growing body of AI copyright litigation.
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.