This analysis describes what LinkedIn's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the data usage scope for model training operations across LinkedIn and Microsoft systems. The authorization covers both recommendation and feature development as well as generative AI applications, with a specified opt-out mechanism available to users.
Under this clause, personal data is used as input for AI model training unless the user exercises the opt-out right specified in Section 4. The terms apply the data usage authorization to both traditional recommendation features and newer generative AI functionality.
How other platforms handle this
Only models with a post-mitigation score of "medium" or below can be deployed. Only models with a post-mitigation score of "high" or below can be developed further.
Training Datasets. In some cases, we access datasets provided by third parties for our model training purposes. These datasets may include personal data (even if such third parties and Mistral AI use good practices to filter out such personal data), proprietary data, or public data. [...] Data publi...
Our Additional Use Case Guidelines apply to certain other use cases, including consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use, and Model Context Protocol servers.
Monitoring
LinkedIn has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We use personal data and other data to train and improve LinkedIn and Microsoft AI/ML models for the recommendations and other features described in Section 2.4, as well as generative AI features. We explain how you can opt out of your personal data being used to train generative AI models in Section 4.— Excerpt from LinkedIn's LinkedIn Privacy Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the data usage scope for model training operations across LinkedIn and Microsoft systems. The authorization covers both recommendation and feature development as well as generative AI applications, with a specified opt-out mechanism available to users.
Under this clause, personal data is used as input for AI model training unless the user exercises the opt-out right specified in Section 4. The terms apply the data usage authorization to both traditional recommendation features and newer generative AI functionality.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn.