Monitor the AI platforms your product depends on.

The updated terms establish AWS's authority to suspend and permanently close accounts based on spend limit violations, and introduce new team member content ownership and liability rules that affect how data and intellectual property are governed within shared projects. Organizations using AWS Bedrock should understand that enabling spend limits creates exposure to account suspension and permanent content deletion without a specified reactivation grace period. Project owners become liable for team member conduct and content contributions, which affects internal governance and contract allocation of risk.

The updated terms fundamentally restructure dispute resolution from a private, streamlined arbitration process to mandatory public litigation in Texas courts with strict filing deadlines. Users in other states or countries face significantly increased friction and cost to pursue claims, and claims not filed within 1-2 years are permanently barred. This change affects access to justice and the practical enforceability of user rights under the agreement.

The updated terms substantially expand Perplexity's unilateral authority to modify which services are covered, introduce marketing data sharing outside the data processing agreement, and establish automatic acceptance of changes through continued use. For organizations with vendor governance frameworks, data processing agreements, or privacy representations tied to specific product scope and processor-only data handling, these changes create new compliance review obligations and potential gaps between what the organization has represented to customers or regulators and what Perplexity's terms now permit.

The updated terms establish mandatory arbitration and eliminate class action and jury trial rights for all disputes, including claims that arose before users agreed to the revised terms. This fundamentally alters how disputes are resolved; users can no longer pursue claims in court or as part of a collective action, and must instead proceed through individual arbitration.

The updated terms establish that workspace administrators, not individual employees, control access to conversations and data retention periods within enterprise accounts. This represents a material shift in data governance authority that affects how enterprise customers must document employee monitoring practices and may create compliance implications under privacy regulations. The expanded retention exception also permits OpenAI to retain deleted conversations longer than previously stated, creating operational discretion that may complicate data deletion commitments.